Bis 220 Week 1 Paper

An act of legislature that declares, proscribes, or commands something a specific law, expressed in writing. (thefreedicitionary. com) The Do Not nominate slaying Act of 2003 and The Fair Credit Reporting Act, 1970 both fall under(a) this definition. The Do Not Call Implementation Act , 2003, authorized the Federal Trade Commission to have fees for the implementation and enforcement of a do-not-call registry and for other purposes. The Fair Reporting Act of 1970 controls the collection, use, and redistribution of your consumer breeding (Stroup, About. om). These rationales or acts practice into existence for a number of reasons, some are even ethical in nature. But it is verbalize when you create a lot of rules you create a lot of rule breakers. So lets take a look at what brought The Do Not Call Implementation Act, 2003 was promulgated. This Do Not Call Implementation Act of 2003 was to attend to get a fee for telemarketers or businesses who wanted to make calls to people wh o didnt have their name on the do not call list and to enforce provisions to the do not call registry.As stated earlier rules create rule breakers and people were not quest the Telemarketing Sale Rule. So the rules have to constantly be updated because people are essay to variety out how to get around the rule. This rule came about because consumers just wanted to be left only if when at home and not be bothered with annoying phone calls from telemarketers while in the mettle of eating dinner. They dont want a credit card company calling trying to extend credit in the middle of the afternoon while their home school child is pickings a nap.Which leads us to The Fair Credit Reporting Act, 1970. The Fair Credit Reporting Act, 1970 was brought into play to help the banks and the consumer. As stated above it controls the collection, use, and redistribution of consumer training (Stroup, about. com). In order to keep the banking system running steady and not putting out unfavorable information on consumer. The act has rules and guidelines for companies that report consumer credit. If the banks have bad information on a consumer and gives the consumer a loan then that can be a puzzle for the bank or the consumer.But if all reporting stays with in the guidelines of the act then the chances are the information will be good and the right decision will be made in lending. The job is the bank will have good information in some cases, but the consumer has another consumers information and uses it for themselves. These are the types of unethical things that people do, which has a snowball effect. Because it hurts the banks, making it harder for them to get money from the Federal Reserve, which in turn tightens up the lending criteria of the banks, thus making it difficult for consumers to get the things they need.But when you create rules, you create rule breakers. So although the two acts help the FTC govern the different areas that the acts cover. They still have their pros and cons, some which we discussed above, and others that we did not. But my opinion is get rid of some of the rules, get rid of the rule breakers. Resources Govtrack. us, H. R 395 (108th) Do Not Call Implementation Act Jack Stroup, About. com Guide The Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970